In the penalty notice, our client was accused of failing to maintain the required distance from the vehicle in front. The distance had been less than 3/10 of half the speedometer value. The standard consequence is a fine of 160,00 € and 1 month driving ban. An expert opinion was then commissioned to verify the

In a fine proceeding due to speeding, we were able to obtain for our client a reversal of the corresponding decision of the OLG Bamberg as well as the judgment of the AG Schweinfurt. According to the established case law of the Bamberg Higher Regional Court at the time, the court was of the opinion

Following the restrictions imposed by the Corona ordinances of the federal states, the first courts are now having to deal with the corresponding administrative offenses. In the present case, the charge is that of being in public space with more than the permitted number of people – inside a passenger car. The question arises whether

As feared shortly after the introduction of the new “cell phone law,” the extension to the use of electronic devices of any kind is spreading. For example, the use of the permanently installed touchscreen in a Tesla proved fatal for its driver. It should be noted that the vehicles of the company. Tesla, the touchscreen

In a penalty case, a professional driver was charged with the following offense: They did not observe the traffic prohibition ordered by sign 251 with additional signs, although the roadfläche was additionally marked by traffic devices. § 41 para. 1 in conjunction with Annex 2, § 43 para. 3, § 49 StVO; § 24, §

From time to time it happens that fine proceedings are discontinued without any justification. This was the case here with regard to a speeding violation in Hesse, which our client was charged with. Following our objection, the proceedings were discontinued by the Kassel Regional Council in accordance with §§ 46 OWiG in conjunction with 170